Ghosting has become one of the most frustrating breakdowns in today’s hiring process, leaving both employers and job seekers in the dark. The Vanishing Candidate Report, a new survey of more than 1,000 U.S. workers from trusted online resume builder LiveCareer, reveals that while most candidates do not believe ghosting potential employers is acceptable, one in four job seekers have done so, and many say they would disengage from employers after a negative or unfair hiring experience.
Key Findings
- One in four job seekers (25%) have ghosted an employer at some point during the hiring process.
- Accepting another job offer is the most common reason candidates ghost, and negative hiring experiences often accelerate disengagement.
- Nearly four in 10 job seekers (39%) say they would consider ghosting if a hiring experience felt unfair or poorly handled.
- Among job seekers who use AI, only 8% says it has made them less responsive to employers
Candidate Ghosting Extends Beyond Early Applications
While most job seekers (75%) say they have never ghosted a potential employer, LiveCareer’s data shows that when ghosting does occur, it isn’t confined to early-stage applications.
When ghosting occurs:
- 15% stopped responding after submitting an application
- 13% stopped responding after a screening call or interview
- 8% stopped responding after receiving a job offer
Why Job Seekers Go Silent
Candidates most often disengage after accepting another job, but experience-related friction remains a widespread risk factor throughout the hiring process. Bad experiences in the job search, including a negative interview experience or poor communication, an inaccurate or misleading job description, as well as an overly automated, AI-driven hiring process collectively are strong drivers for candidate ghosting.
Top reasons job seekers stopped responding:
- 51% accepted another job
- 32% lost interest in the role or company
- 23% cited a negative interview experience or poor communication
- 23% said pay or benefits were not competitive
- 19% said the job differed from how it was described or seemed misleading
- 12% said the process felt overly automated or impersonal
AI Is Not the Main Driver of Candidate Ghosting
As AI becomes more widely used, it is often cited as a reason job candidates disengage. LiveCareer’s data suggests AI plays a more limited role, with many job seekers not yet adopting these tools for the job search, and only a small share reporting negative effects on responsiveness.
- Only one-third (34%) of job seekers say they have used AI tools such as ChatGPT or resume generators to apply for jobs.
- Among job seekers who use AI, only 8% say it made them less responsive, either by leading them to apply to roles they weren’t interested in or to apply to more jobs than they could track.
Ghosting Isn’t Acceptable Unless the Hiring Process is Broken
Most job seekers say ghosting is unacceptable, but poor or unfair hiring experiences can quickly change that sentiment.
- 73% say ghosting a potential employer is not acceptable behavior.
- 70% say worries about damaging their professional reputation influence whether they ghost.
- 39% say they would consider ghosting a potential employer after a bad or unfair hiring experience.
Clear Communication and Transparency Keep Candidates Engaged
Job seekers are most likely to remain in the hiring process when employers communicate consistently, set clear expectations, and do not rely too heavily on AI.
What would prevent candidate ghosting:
- 29% – Consistent communication and timely updates at each stage
- 25% – Transparency around salary, expectations, and hiring timelines
- 23% – Clear timelines for next steps and expected response windows
- 16% – Accurate job descriptions that reflect the role
- 13% – Meaningful feedback after interviews
- 13% – Reduce automation and increase real human interaction
“Today’s job hunt is exhausting, with job seekers often submitting hundreds of applications to land a new role,” said Jasmine Escalera, career expert at LiveCareer. “When candidates encounter long periods of silence, unclear timelines, misleading job descriptions, or overly automated processes, they naturally shift their attention to more promising opportunities. Applying to a high volume of roles also increases the likelihood that a candidate could vanish once they receive an offer elsewhere.”
Thanks for reading CPA Practice Advisor!
Subscribe Already registered? Log In
Need more information? Read the FAQs
