Skip to main content

Accounting

Countdown to Compliance: Lease Accounting Date Looms for Private Companies

After ample lead time and a COVID-19-related extension, private companies can’t afford to wait any longer to implement the new lease accounting standard. Public companies have had to comply with new accounting practices for ASC 842 since 2019, and the ...

accounting software pixabay Goumbik office 2717014_960_720

By Michael Stevenson.

After ample lead time and a COVID-19-related extension, private companies can’t afford to wait any longer to implement the new lease accounting standard. Public companies have had to comply with new accounting practices for ASC 842 since 2019, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) originally set the effective date for private companies in 2020 — before granting them a one-year reprieve twice.

Some companies may have placed preparations for ASC 842 on the backburner due to the FASB’s extension, especially in light of myriad challenges during a global pandemic. Now, time is of the essence, and waiting any longer to implement updated processes for accounting and reporting could prove more costly in the long run. With the effective date rapidly approaching, private companies need to be aware of the new standard’s implications for their entire organization and take steps for compliance.

Best practices for meeting the ASC 842 lease accounting standard

Understand complexities and specific changes in ASC 842. It is crucial for in-scope companies to understand the factors that set ASC 842 apart from prior lease accounting standards and ensure they are on track for compliance. Ultimately, ASC 842 aims to enhance the transparency of lease obligations by including those obligations on the balance sheet while also streamlining the reporting process under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Previously, under ASC 840, operating leases were not recorded on the balance sheet, but now those future lease payments must be recognized. The definition of a lease under ASC 842 is similar to that under ASC 840; however, there are some important nuances to be aware of that can change the outcome.

ASC 842’s approach to the identified asset sets it apart from previous determinations under ASC 840. As in traditional lease accounting standards, ASC 842 requires an identified asset to be either explicitly or implicitly specified in the contract, and it does not consider the asset specified if the supplier could substitute similar assets. However, ASC 842 only considers substitution rights substantive if the supplier meets both of the following criteria:

  1. Possesses the practical ability to substitute alternative assets throughout the period of use.
  2. Would economically benefit from the substitution.

The new standard determines whether a supplier’s substitution right is substantive based on facts and circumstances at the time of contract inception. If the right to substitute is substantive, then there is no identified asset, and the contract does not contain a lease. This guidance may deem more contracts to include a lease than under prior standards.

Under ASC 842, a private company must also have the right to control the use of the identified asset, which requires the company to meet economic and power criteria. Economic criteria refer to a company’s ability to benefit directly or indirectly from the identified asset, either through use, holding or subleasing. Companies that meet power criteria need to satisfy one of these conditions:

  • Can direct how and for what purpose the asset is used throughout the period of use (i.e., the customer directs the relevant decisions during the period of use).
  • When the relevant decisions are predetermined:
    • The customer designed the asset in a way that predetermined the relevant decisions; or
    • The customer has the right to operate (or direct others in operating) the asset throughout the period of use.

Prepare for compliance as soon as possible. The changes outlined above go into effect for periods beginning after December 15, 2021, and should be reflected in lease portfolios filed for fiscal years beginning after that date. Entering the fiscal year in accordance with the new standard is far superior to playing compliance catch-up down the road. A proactive approach to implementation can save internal teams the stress of tackling a major lease accounting revamp on a time crunch. Hiring outside assistance will likely become more costly as the effective date draws closer as well.

Anticipate bumps in the road. Preparing sooner leaves private companies, particularly those with an elaborate lease portfolio, plenty of time to clear hurdles on the track to compliance. Under ASC 842, leases will now be recognized on the balance sheet, so there is an increased focus on whether a contract is or contains a lease. It is important that private companies have a clear view of their complete lease population, including short-term leases.

Lease population completeness can prove challenging for companies with large lease portfolios. The sheer volume of lease agreements makes it easy for companies to overlook leases, especially those embedded in broader agreements. In the past, companies may have been less likely to identify a lease that was part of a broader transaction or arrangement because it was absent from the balance sheet. Companies with an international presence may have had added difficulty identifying leases written in other languages and based on foreign legal frameworks. Data silos, perhaps exacerbated by a company’s recent work-from-home policy, can also contribute to lease oversights.

Consider using all available resources. Ensure any internal personnel responsible for lease accounting compliance have a firm grasp of how ASC 842 impacts company operations. It might be helpful to look to public companies, compliant since 2019, as examples.

To remedy confusion stemming from complex arrangements and disparate data, some companies have adopted lease management technology. Automation helps companies handle complexity in pricing and contract structures, track lease events, and report requirements and accounting variables. Most importantly, lease management software builds a comprehensive portfolio that allows companies to monitor leases more easily moving forward.

An experienced third-party advisor can serve as a sounding board and subject matter specialist on the accounting provisions of ASC 842 to determine whether compliance is being properly achieved. Outsourcing can also help companies look beyond the new standard’s effective date to ascertain which departments are impacted by ASC 842 in the long term. Existing systems or processes might require modification to meet the updated reporting and disclosure requirements.

The lasting impacts of the new standard

It is too early to tell what influence ASC 842 will have on leasing as the new standard’s legacy depends on larger market and societal trends. The introduction of the new standard coincides with other lease-related changes private companies are experiencing. For example, the pandemic may have inspired some to cut down on office space in favor of a permanent hybrid or work-from-home environment. Others may have renewed their leases to encourage employees to return to the office. Conditions in the post-pandemic economy — such as interest rate levels — will also influence leasing trends.

One thing is for certain: Private companies should begin preparing financial statements in accordance with the new standard as soon as they are able. They’re encouraged to consider the long-term implications ASC 842 might have on operations and leverage the tools and resources at their disposal for sustained compliance.

========

Michael Stevenson serves as the National Practice Leader for BDO’s Accounting & Reporting Advisory Services group (“ARAS”). Michael leads a national team of partners and professionals assisting companies with a wide range of advisory services in areas such as: Accounting, Reporting, Capital Market Transactions, Divestitures, Bankruptcy and Reorganizations, Board Advisory Services, and various other technical accounting focused services. Click here to learn more about Michael and BDO.