AICPA Makes Recommendations to IRS and Treasury on ‘All or Nothing’ Approach to Dual Consolidated Loss

Taxes | November 24, 2025

AICPA Makes Recommendations to IRS and Treasury on ‘All or Nothing’ Approach to Dual Consolidated Loss

The AICPA is asking Treasury and the IRS to allow an exception for these permanently disallowed amounts so companies aren’t penalized unnecessarily.

Isaac M. O'Bannon

In a letter sent to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) submitted recommendations on the “all or nothing” approach to dual consolidated losses (DCL) as requested in Notice 2025-44. This approach means that if even a portion the DCL is used in a foreign country, the entire loss cannot be deducted in the U.S.

The concern of “double dipping” cannot occur if the items of deductions or loss that represent a permanent difference between the U.S. federal income tax law and foreign law are excluded from the DCL calculation.

The AICPA is asking Treasury and the IRS to allow an exception for these permanently disallowed amounts so companies aren’t penalized unnecessarily.

Recommended Articles

The AICPA recommends Treasury and the IRS issue guidance stating that if the “all or nothing” approach is retained, any expenses that can never be used under foreign tax law should be left out of the U.S. loss calculation. This ensures companies aren’t penalized for deductions that don’t create a risk of double use. Additionally in the letter, the AICPA provided language that will address the issue as an exception to the existing general rule. This language employs a narrower provision in the computation of a DCL under Treas. Reg. § 1.1503(d)-5 and would fill a gap in the existing regulations and ensure that the “blunt” nature of the “all or nothing” approach does not inappropriately disallow deductions that do not give rise to a “double dipping” concern.

“The AICPA’s recommended language would not require complex stacking or ordering rules and would not increase the administrative complexity and burden,” said Reema Patel, Senior Manager for Tax Policy & Advocacy for the AICPA. “Rather, we believe that the framework for the documentation required to substantiate the permanent disallowance already exists in the current regulations, and a narrow exception can be included without altering the overall architecture of the regulations.”

Thanks for reading CPA Practice Advisor!

Subscribe for free to get personalized daily content, newsletters, continuing education, podcasts, whitepapers and more…
Retirement Savers Be Warned: A Tax Break Has Disappeared in 2026

Taxes January 6, 2026 

Retirement Savers Be Warned: A Tax Break Has Disappeared in 2026

For years, workers nearing retirement could decide whether to take the immediate tax break of pretax savings in their 401(k) plans or build tax-free income they could access later from a Roth IRA. But starting in January, that choice will disappear for high-income earners.

Leave a Reply