Skip to main content


Think Twice About Once-a-Year IRA Rollover Rule

Under the federal income tax law – specifically, Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code – a taxpayer can roll over funds from one IRA to another only once a year.


Under the federal income tax law –  specifically, Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code – a taxpayer can roll over funds from one IRA to another only once a year. Based on legislative history and the IRS’ own interpretation of this rule, as spelled out in Pub. 590, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), practitioners have previously applied this rule separately to each IRA owned by a taxpayer. But a new Tax Court case upsets the apple cart (Bobrow, TC Memo 2014-21).

The basic premise is simple enough. Generally, there’s no tax due on a transfer of funds from one IRA to another if the rollover is completed within 60 days. In effect, a taxpayer can benefit from the use of the funds for up to 60 days, no questions asked, as long as the same amount is redeposited in time. The only restraint is the once-a-year rollover rule. Now the Tax Court has added another twist.   

The case involved multiple transactions taking place in 2008. Here are the key facts: A taxpayer, Alvan Bobrow, received a distribution from his traditional IRA (we’ll call it IRA #1) on April 14 and followed it up with a distribution from his rollover IRA (IRA #2) on June 6. Then he repaid the same amount into IRA#1 on June 10 and repaid the like amount into IRA #2 on August 4. 

Because both repayments were made within the 60-day timeframe for IRA rollovers, Alvan said that each one qualified for tax-free treatment. Accordingly, he paid zero tax on the IRA distributions on his 2008 return.

But the Tax Court didn’t agree with Alvan’s logic. It said that the once-a-year limit on IRA rollovers invalidated the transfer to IRA #2. As a result, the distribution is taxable. The Court concluded that the rule applies to all of the taxpayer’s IRA accounts, based on its reading of the language in the law, as well as citing previous opinions. “Regardless of how many IRAs he or she maintains, a taxpayer may make only one nontaxable rollover contribution within each one-year period.”

This seems to fly in the face of the IRS’ guidance as stated on pg. 25 of Pub. 590. The relevant section is quoted below.

“Waiting period between rollovers. Generally, if you make a tax-free rollover of any part of a distribution from a traditional IRA, you cannot, within a 1-year period, make a tax-free rollover of any later distribution from that same IRA. You also cannot make a tax-free rollover of any amount distributed, within the same 1-year period, from the IRA into which you made the tax-free rollover.

The 1-year period begins on the date you receive the IRA distribution, not on the date you roll it over into an IRA.

Example. You have two traditional IRAs, IRA-1 and IRA-2. You make a tax-free rollover of a distribution from IRA-1 into a new traditional IRA (IRA-3). You cannot, within 1 year of the distribution from IRA-1, make a tax-free rollover of any distribution from either IRA-1 or IRA-3 into another traditional IRA.

However, the rollover from IRA-1 into IRA-3 does not prevent you from making a tax-free rollover from IRA-2 into any other traditional IRA. This is because you have not, within the last year, rolled over, tax free, any distribution from IRA-2 or made a tax-free rollover into IRA-2.”

What happens now? An emboldened IRS may decide to contest other IRA rollovers involving a comparable set of facts. To play it safe, you should advise clients to observe the once-a-year rollover rule as it applies to all their IRAs. Doing so will avoid any potential challenge from the IRS on this point.